tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12783726.post114375893392455401..comments2024-02-19T16:39:32.319+08:00Comments on When {Puffy} Meets ^RedDevil^: Brontok - DDOSC.S.Leehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10778262436985693992noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12783726.post-1143907986455405072006-04-02T00:13:00.000+08:002006-04-02T00:13:00.000+08:00Maybe deflecting is the way when there's no counte...Maybe deflecting is the way when there's no countermeasure, however I think it should not be too trivial to encounter ping flooding if ISP involves. Nice comment anyway :)C.S.Leehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10778262436985693992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12783726.post-1143793626290082552006-03-31T16:27:00.000+08:002006-03-31T16:27:00.000+08:00This isn't entirely unheard of... I seem to rememb...This isn't entirely unheard of... I seem to remember microsoft changing the DNS record of one of their servers in response to a DDoS from a virus in the past. If you're paying per megabyte bandwidth charges and don't have a fast enough server/link to weather the DoS anyway then deflecting it elsewhere makes some sense. If your site's going to be unreachable anyway you may as well at least avoid the massive bandwidth bill.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com